Comparison of shear bond strength of self‑etching fluoride releasing adhesives with and without pumice prophylaxis.
| dc.contributor.author | Devi, V R Shobbana | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kumaraswamy, Anand M | |
| dc.contributor.author | Venkateswaran, S | |
| dc.contributor.author | Iyer, Kavitha S | |
| dc.contributor.author | Krishnaswamy, N R | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-01-02T07:18:03Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-01-02T07:18:03Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015-07 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Context: Despite the advances in orthodontic material and treatment mechanics, the placement of fixed appliances increases the risk of enamel demineralization. The development of fluoride release adhesives has attracted considerable interests because the combined use of antimicrobials and fluoride enhances the cariostatic effect. Aim: To compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of fluoride release adhesives with established orthodontic adhesives and assess failure mode using adhesive remnant index (ARI). Settings and Design: The present study included 80 maxillary premolars which were randomly divided into four groups (n = 20) and were further subdivided into two subgroups A ‑ Pumice prophylaxis (PP) and subgroup B ‑ No PP (n = 10). Materials and Methods: Stainless steel brackets were bonded with Transbond XT, Transbond plus (TP) color change adhesive, Light Bond, and Clearfil protect bond. After debonding, the ARI was used to assess the mode of bracket failure. Statistical Analysis: The data were analyzed using two‑way analysis of variance, Post‑hoc Tukey Honest significant differences test, and Chi‑square test. Results: The mean SBS of Group 4 was comparably higher regardless of PP. Brackets bonded with TP showed a comparable SBS to conventional Transbond XT. The ARI scores were predominately 2. Conclusions: Fluoride releasing adhesives combined with antibacterial monomer can play a vital role in reducing white spot lesions by enhancing the cariostatic effect especially in noncompliant\medically compromised patients. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Devi V R Shobbana, Kumaraswamy Anand M, Venkateswaran S, Iyer Kavitha S, Krishnaswamy N R. Comparison of shear bond strength of self‑etching fluoride releasing adhesives with and without pumice prophylaxis. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2015 July-Aug; 26(4): 390-395. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/169562 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.source.uri | https://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2015;volume=26;issue=4;spage=390;epage=395;aulast=Shobbana | en_US |
| dc.subject | Antibacterial monomer | en_US |
| dc.subject | fluoride | en_US |
| dc.subject | pumice prophylaxis | en_US |
| dc.subject | self‑etching primer | en_US |
| dc.subject | shear bond strength | en_US |
| dc.title | Comparison of shear bond strength of self‑etching fluoride releasing adhesives with and without pumice prophylaxis. | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |