Malodor reductions and improved oral hygiene by toothbrushing and mouthrinsing.

dc.contributor.authorNandlal, B
dc.contributor.authorShahikumar, P
dc.contributor.authorAvinash, B S
dc.contributor.authorSreenivasan, P K
dc.contributor.authorSubramanyam, R
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-01T04:07:07Z
dc.date.available2016-11-01T04:07:07Z
dc.date.issued2016-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: This clinical study compared the effects of an antibacterial regimen, comprising a triclosan toothpaste and a 0.075% cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) mouthrinse, on malodor, self‑reported malodor, and oral hygiene measures such as dental plaque, gingivitis, and bleeding relative to brushing with a fluoride toothpaste. Materials and Methods: At baseline, 36 subjects were evaluated for malodor (9‑point organoleptic scale [OLT]), dental plaque (Turesky modification of Quigley‑Hein; PI), gingivitis (Löe‑Silness; GI) and bleeding (Ainamo and Bay; BI) and randomized to (1) tooth brushing with fluoride toothpaste, or (2) a regimen comprising tooth brushing with a triclosan toothpaste and mouth rinsing with CPC mouthrinse. After the first use of assigned treatments, subjects were evaluated for malodor 2 h after breakfast (OLT‑2 h) and used provided treatments for the next 14 days. On the 7th and 14th days, subjects refrained from oral hygiene for 12 h before evaluations (OLT, PI, GI, and BI) and then performed oral hygiene at the dental clinic. Subjects were evaluated for malodor 2 h after breakfast (OLT‑2 h) and self‑assessed their malodor on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). Results: Treatment groups demonstrated no significant differences in OLT, PI, GI, BI at baseline (P > 0.05). OLT‑2 h scores after the first use of regimen and after tooth brushing alone were 5.94 and 6.21, respectively, and were statistically significantly different (P < 0.05). Correspondingly, the regimen demonstrated progressive reductions in OLT and OLT‑2 h on the 7th and 14th day evaluations (5.81, 4.88, and 5.09, 4.20, respectively) and were significantly lower than after tooth brushing alone (6.49, 6.18, and 6.35, 5.99, respectively) (P < 0.05). From the 7th to 14th days, the regimen also demonstrated progressively lower PI, GI, BI, and self‑reported malodor (VAS scores) which were significantly lower than tooth brushing alone (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Results from this study demonstrated that a regimen comprising a triclosan toothpaste and CPC mouthrinse demonstrated significant malodor reductions 2 h after the first use and progressively increasing reductions in malodor, dental plaque, gingivitis, bleeding and self‑reported malodor from the 7th to 14th days than tooth brushing alone.en_US
dc.identifier.citationNandlal B, Shahikumar P, Avinash B S, Sreenivasan P K, Subramanyam R. Malodor reductions and improved oral hygiene by toothbrushing and mouthrinsing. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2016 Jan-Feb; 27(1): 42-47.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/178072
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2016;volume=27;issue=1;spage=42;epage=47;aulast=Nandlalen_US
dc.subjectOral hygieneen_US
dc.subjectmalodoren_US
dc.subjectmouthrinseen_US
dc.subjecttoothpasteen_US
dc.titleMalodor reductions and improved oral hygiene by toothbrushing and mouthrinsing.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ijdr2016v27n1p42.pdf
Size:
550.92 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Original research
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: