Result of the poor - grade student file rotation in KKU Medical School in nineteen ninety.

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorAmorn Premgamoneen_US
dc.contributor.authorSurapol Veerasireen_US
dc.contributor.authorTheerawat Whantogen_US
dc.contributor.authorChulapant Oungjanilen_US
dc.contributor.authorSompong Srisaenpangen_US
dc.contributor.authorWeerayut Daenseekaewen_US
dc.contributor.authorChanchai Pantongviriyakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorVinai Tantiyasawasdikulen_US
dc.contributor.authorFackchit Kunuraten_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-24T04:34:30Z
dc.date.available2011-02-24T04:34:30Z
dc.date.created2010-05-22en_US
dc.date.issued2010-05-22en_US
dc.description.abstract A  file  for  each  student  who  had  a  poor  study  result  in  1989  was  created.  The  file  contained  the  student’s  background  data  related information.  There  was  a   tatal  of  75  files.  Half  of  theem  were  randomly  selected  to  be  he  study  group  and  the  rest  were the  control  group.  The  files  of  the  study  group  were  distributed to  the  study  group  and  the  rest  were  the control  group.  The  files  of  the  A  set  of  quedtionnaires  for  the  staff  was  went  to  the  department  as  son  as  the  students  left  the  department.  Students’  opinions  were  collected  by  questionnaires  at  the  beginning  and  the end  of  the  academic  year.  The  numbers  of  re – examinations   of  each  student  in  1989  and  1990  were  collected  and  served  as  indicator  for  the  sudent’s  study  achievements.  This  randomized  control  study  revealed  that  there  was  no  significant  difference  in  staff  attitudes  to  both  groups.  The  students  in  both  group  had  no  difference  in  the  number  of  re – examination.  The  opinions  of  both  groups  as  a  result  of  the  response  to  32  questions,  are  not  statistically  different.  The  major  problem  in  this  study  was  the  low  response  rate.  Only  one – hied  of  he  staff  used  the  circulated  file,  and  61.5%  of  them  responded  to  the  questionnaires. No  negative  effect  was  found   in this  study .  Most  of  the  staff  who  replied  to  questions   supported  the continuation  of  the  file  rotation.  To  improve  the  effectiveness,  we  suggest  that  the  file  should  be  sent  to  the  staff  who  are  really  interested  in  student’s  problems.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSrinagarind Medical Journal (SMJ); Vo. 9 No. 4 October-December 1994; 164-169en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/133963
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen Universityen_US
dc.rightsAcademic Affairs, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, KhonKaen, Thailanden_US
dc.source.urihttps://thailand.digitaljournals.org/index.php/SMJ/issue/archiveen_US
dc.source.urihttps://thailand.digitaljournals.org/index.php/SMJ/article/view/4039en_US
dc.titleResult of the poor - grade student file rotation in KKU Medical School in nineteen ninety.en_US
dc.typeOriginal Articlesen_US
Files
Collections
Srinagarind Medical Journal