Comparison of the conformation and stability of the native dimeric, monomelic, tetrameric and the desensitized forms of the nucleotide pyrophosphatase from mung bean (Phaseolus aureus) seedlings.

Abstract
A homogenous and crystalline form of nucleotide pyrophosphatase (EC 3.6.1.9) from Phaseolus aureus (mung bean) seedlings was used for the study of the regulation of enzyme activity by adenine nucleotides. The native dimeric form of the enzyme had a helical content of about 65% which was reduced to almost zero values by the addition of AMP. In addition to this change in the helical content, AMP converted the native dimer to a tetramer. Desensitization of AMP regulation, without an alteration of the molecular weight, was achieved either by reversible denaturation with 6 Μ urea or by passage through a column of Blue Sepharose but additionof phydroxymercuribenzoate desensitized the enzyme by dissociating the native dimer to a monomer. The changes in the quaternary structure and conformation of the enzyme consequent to AMP interaction or desensitization were monitored by measuring the helical content, EDTA inactivation and Zn2+ reactivation, stability towards heat denaturation, profiles of urea denaturation and susceptibility towards proteolytic digestion. Based on these results and our earlier work on this enzyme, we propose a model for the regulation of the mung bean nucleotide pyrophosphatase by association-dissociation and conformational changes. The model emphasizes that multiple mechanisms are operative in the desensitization of regulatory proteins.
Description
Keywords
Phaseolus aureus, nucleotide pyrophosphatase, regulation, desensitization, conformational changes, circular dichroism, optical rotatory dispersion
Citation
Reddy A R Venugopala, Balakrishnan C V, Sobhanaditya J, Ravindranath S D, Ananthanarayanan V S. Comparison of the conformation and stability of the native dimeric, monomelic, tetrameric and the desensitized forms of the nucleotide pyrophosphatase from mung bean (Phaseolus aureus) seedlings. Journal of Biosciences. 1980 Sept; 2(3): 211-225.