Integrated Management of Charcoal Rot and Its Influence on Seed Yield and Quality in Soybean

dc.contributor.authorPatidar, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorYadav, VKen_US
dc.contributor.authorAmrate, PKen_US
dc.contributor.authorLovewanshi, LSen_US
dc.contributor.authorKaroda, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorKharte, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorKurmi, S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-24T08:02:31Z
dc.date.available2024-09-24T08:02:31Z
dc.date.issued2023-12
dc.description.abstractCharcoal rot (Macrophomina phaseolina) causes high grain yield loss in major soybean-growing nations worldwide. The present study aimed to reveal the effect of stage-wise charcoal rot incidence and their root and stem severity index on the yield criteria of soybean varieties. Additionally, an attempt was made to derive integrated management practices and their influence on seed quality. All the twelve varieties were affected by charcoal rot, and its incidence and root and stem severity index were high in Shivalik (48.5% and 3.7, respectively). In yield estimation, the percentage of yield loss ranged from 8.7% (JS 20-98) to 53.9% (Shivalik). Percent yield loss had a strong significant positive relation with percent incidence (0.912**) and Root and Stem severity index (0.813**) of charcoal rot. Seed treatment of Penflufen 13.28% + Trifloxystrobin 13.28 % FS @ 1ml/kg followed by spraying of tebuconazole 25% EC @ 0.1 % spraying at 45,60,75 days was significantly superior in reducing charcoal rot (19.7%) in comparison to untreated (37.3%). The highest seed germination (80.0 %) and least association with M. phaseolina (13.33%), Aspergillus flavus (3.33%), Fusarium sp., (13.34%) in comparison to control (50, 36.67, 23.33 and 36.67 %, respectively) were also resulted from the seed obtained from above treatment. In bioagent, seed treatment of T. harzianum @ 10 gm/kg followed by foliar spray of tebuconazole 25% EC @ 0.1% at 45,60,75 days was the second-best combination among all treatments in all respects. The effect of these fungicides and bio agents as seed treatment also improved the number of branches, pods, 100 seed weight and yield. Hence, these combinations could be applied to minimize charcoal rot and yield losses in soybean.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsDepartment of Plant Pathology, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur (482 004), Indiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsDepartment of Plant Pathology, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur (482 004), Indiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur (482 004), Indiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsDepartment of Plant Pathology, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur (482 004), Indiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsDepartment of Plant Pathology, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur (482 004), Indiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsDepartment of Plant Pathology, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur (482 004), Indiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsDepartment of Plant Pathology, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur (482 004), Indiaen_US
dc.identifier.citationPatidar S, Yadav VK, Amrate PK, Lovewanshi LS, Karoda C, Kharte S, Kurmi S.. Integrated Management of Charcoal Rot and Its Influence on Seed Yield and Quality in Soybean . International Journal of Environment and Climate Change. 2023 Dec; 13(6): 830-842en_US
dc.identifier.issn2581-8627
dc.identifier.placeIndiaen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/230907
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherMs. M. B. Mondalen_US
dc.relation.issuenumber6en_US
dc.relation.volume13en_US
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i123745en_US
dc.subjectAssociated mycofloraen_US
dc.subjectcharcoal roten_US
dc.subjectincidenceen_US
dc.subjectmanagement and yield lossen_US
dc.titleIntegrated Management of Charcoal Rot and Its Influence on Seed Yield and Quality in Soybeanen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
ijecc2023v13n12p830.pdf
Size:
684.66 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format