Comparative Study of Efficacy of Misoprostol Vs Dinoprostone Gel For Induction of Labour.

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorGupta, Swaran
dc.contributor.authorHak, Jyoti
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Dinesh
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-06T04:21:07Z
dc.date.available2016-12-06T04:21:07Z
dc.date.issued2015-07
dc.description.abstractAbstract This study has been undertaken to compare the safety and efficacy of intra-vaginal misoprostol (PGE1 analogue) with intra-cervical dinoprostone (PGE2) in progress and induction of labour, the maternal side effects and the foetal outcome. Group I comprised of 50 patients who underwent induction with misoprostol vaginal tablets and Group II comprised of 50 patients who underwent induction with dinoprostone intra cervical gel. Labour induction was considered successful if subjects delivered within 24 hours of initiation of either of two methods. The maternal and foetal outcome were measured i.e., Bishop's score, time intervals from induction to delivery, need for oxytocin, mode of delivery, maternal and foetal side effects. The results of the present study show that the time intervals from induction-delivery intervals were significantly shorter and the requirement of oxytocin was less for augmentation of the labour in the misoprostol group than dinoprostone gel group. Intravaginal misoprostol is an effective agent for induction of labour than intra cervical gel. The drug is easy to use, effective and safe to mother and the foetus. Misoprostol can be routinely used for induction of labour than dinoprostone gel.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSwaran Gupta, Jyoti Hak, Dinesh Kumar. Comparative Study of Efficacy of Misoprostol Vs Dinoprostone Gel For Induction of Labour. JK Science Journal of Medical Education and Research. 2015 Jul-Sept. 17(3): 118-122.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/179361
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.jkscience.org/archives/volume173/4-Original%20Article%20-17(3)%20issue.pdfen_US
dc.subjectPGE1en_US
dc.subjectPGE2en_US
dc.subjectInduction of Labouren_US
dc.titleComparative Study of Efficacy of Misoprostol Vs Dinoprostone Gel For Induction of Labour.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
jksjmer2015v17n3p118.pdf
Size:
159.07 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
original article
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
JK Science Journal of Medical Education and Research