Accuracy of Infrared Forehead Skin Thermometry in Newborns - A Comparison with Digital Axillary and Rectal Mercury Thermometers.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2020-02
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Akshantala Enterprises Private Limited
Abstract
Temperature is an important vital sign especially in neonates. Providing thermal comfort to baby is part of essential newborn care. The ideal temperature measurement method should be accurate, safe, noninvasive, time efficient, easy to operate and non-disturbing to baby. Mercury thermometers have been banned; rectal measurements are hazardous. Digital axillary thermometers although widely accepted, also have their limitations and sometimes produce questionable results in newborn. Infrared forehead thermometry is a promising tool with controversial results; hence this newer technology needs to be repeatedly tested and validated.METHODSThis is a prospective comparative study conducted in a tertiary care hospital situated in the hilly areas of Solan district of Himachal Pradesh. We simultaneously recorded three temperatures at three sites by different methods and different thermometers Forehead skin temperature was recorded in apparently normal newborns by INNOVA infrared thermometer and axillary temperature was recorded by digital thermometer and rectal temperature was recorded by mercury in glass thermometer.RESULTS260 newborns were included in the study. Data was analysed for correlation by Pearson r coefficient and for agreement by Bland-Altman method. A strong correlation was found between infrared forehead temperature and digital axillary temperature with a Pearson r of 0.826 and 0.801 between infrared forehead temperature and rectal mercury thermometer. Bland-Altman analysis of difference produced a mean difference of 0.49 and level of agreement of -1.67 and +2.65 when axillary digital and infrared forehead thermometry measurements were compared. Mean difference of 0.15 with level of agreement as -2.09 and +2.40 were obtained when rectal mercury and infrared forehead temperatures were compared.CONCLUSIONSAlthough a strong correlation of infrared skin thermometry was found with both axillary digital and rectal mercury temperature measurements. The level of agreement has a wide variation which is not clinically acceptable hence infrared forehead skin thermometry is not recommended for use in newborns.
Description
Keywords
Newborn, infrared Thermometer, Digital Thermometer, Rectal Thermometer, Mercury Thermometer, Temperature, Hypothermia, Fever
Citation
Hajela Rita. Accuracy of Infrared Forehead Skin Thermometry in Newborns - A Comparison with Digital Axillary and Rectal Mercury Thermometers.. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2020 Feb; 9(8): 555-561