Comparability and repeatability of pachymetry in keratoconus using four noncontact techniques.

dc.contributor.authorKumar, Mukesh
dc.contributor.authorShetty, Rohit
dc.contributor.authorJayadev, Chaitra
dc.contributor.authorDutta, Debarun
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-25T10:38:32Z
dc.date.available2016-11-25T10:38:32Z
dc.date.issued2015-09
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare and determine the repeatability of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements using four noncontact pachymetry instruments in eyes with keratoconus. Materials and Methods: The CCT of consecutive patients with keratoconus was measured during a single visit using the swept source optical coherence tomography (SS‑OCT, Casia SS‑1000°CT, Tomey, Nagoya, Japan), a rotating Scheimpflug camera system (Pentacam, Oculus Optikgerate GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), scanning slit topographer (Orbscan IIz topography, Baush and Lomb Surgical Inc., San Dimas, CA, USA), and a hand‑held spectral domain OCT (HHSD‑OCT, Bioptigen Inc., Durham, North Carolina, USA). Test‑retest variability, correlation between measurements and interdevice agreement were analyzed. Results: Fifty eyes of 25 participants were analyzed in this study. All measurement methods correlated well with each other (r > 0.9, P < 0.001). Mean ± standard deviation CCT measured by HHSD‑OCT, Orbscan IIz, SS‑OCT, and Pentacam was 462 ± 41 μm, 458 ± 41 μm, 454 ± 40 μm, and 447 ± 42 μm, respectively. While the HHSD‑OCT over‑estimated the CCT (P < 0.001), there was a good correlation between the measurements obtained from the other three devices. However, the numerical difference was high and this trend was seen in all the paired comparisons. Conclusions: Though the measurements by different devices correlated well, the numerical agreement may be inadequate for their interchangeable use in clinical practice.en_US
dc.identifier.citationKumar Mukesh, Shetty Rohit, Jayadev Chaitra, Dutta Debarun. Comparability and repeatability of pachymetry in keratoconus using four noncontact techniques. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2015 Sept; 63(9): 722-727.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/178890
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2015;volume=63;issue=9;spage=722;epage=727;aulast=Kumaren_US
dc.subjectCentral corneal thicknessen_US
dc.subjecthand‑held spectral domain optical coherence tomographyen_US
dc.subjectultrasound pachymetryen_US
dc.titleComparability and repeatability of pachymetry in keratoconus using four noncontact techniques.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ijo2015v63n9p722.pdf
Size:
887.9 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Original article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: