Efficacy of indirect haemolysis test in the diagnosis of human brucellosis.

dc.contributor.authorBarbuddhe, S Ben_US
dc.contributor.authorYadava, V Ken_US
dc.date.accessioned1997-09-18en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-06-01T17:46:52Z
dc.date.available1997-09-18en_US
dc.date.available2009-06-01T17:46:52Z
dc.date.issued1997-09-18en_US
dc.description.abstractIndirect haemolysis test (IHLT) was used for the serodiagnosis of human brucellosis. Results were compared with those of STAT, RBPT, and CFT. Out of 77 sera 8(10.38 per cent), 15(19.48 per cent), 11(14.28 per cent) and 16(20.77 per cent) were found positive by RBPT, STAT, CFT and IHLT, respectively. Unlike in CFT, the prozone phenomenon was not observed in IHLT. IHLT may prove an effective alternative to use of CFT in the serodiagnosis of brucellosis.en_US
dc.description.affiliationICAR Research Complex, ELA, Old Goa.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBarbuddhe SB, Yadava VK. Efficacy of indirect haemolysis test in the diagnosis of human brucellosis. Journal of Communicable Diseases. 1997 Sep; 29(3): 283-5en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/111746
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subject.meshBrucellosis --diagnosisen_US
dc.subject.meshComplement Fixation Testsen_US
dc.subject.meshHemolysisen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshSerologic Testsen_US
dc.titleEfficacy of indirect haemolysis test in the diagnosis of human brucellosis.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Files
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.79 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: