Quantitative vs qualitative research methods.

dc.contributor.authorLakshman, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorSinha, Len_US
dc.contributor.authorBiswas, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorCharles, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorArora, N Ken_US
dc.date.accessioned2000-05-08en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-05-30T16:12:01Z
dc.date.available2000-05-08en_US
dc.date.available2009-05-30T16:12:01Z
dc.date.issued2000-05-08en_US
dc.description31 references.en_US
dc.description.abstractQuantitative methods have been widely used because of the fact that things that can be measured or counted gain scientific credibility over the unmeasurable. But the extent of biological abnormality, severity, consequences and the impact of illness cannot be satisfactorily captured and answered by the quantitative research alone. In such situations qualitative methods take a holistic perspective preserving the complexities of human behavior by addressing the "why" and "how" questions. In this paper an attempt has been made to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of both the methods and also that a balanced mix of both qualitative as well as quantitative methods yield the most valid and reliable results.en_US
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.en_US
dc.identifier.citationLakshman M, Sinha L, Biswas M, Charles M, Arora NK. Quantitative vs qualitative research methods. Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 2000 May; 67(5): 369-77en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/84341
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.source.urihttps://medind.nic.in/icb/icbai.shtmlen_US
dc.subject.meshData Collection --methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshQuestionnairesen_US
dc.subject.meshResearch --methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshResearch Designen_US
dc.titleQuantitative vs qualitative research methods.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
Files
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.79 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: