Oxytocin versus Misoprostol used as an induction of labour in term in early rupture of Amniotic membranes

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBhatu, Jaydeep J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChaudhari, Ankita B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChauhan, Nilesh R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-16T08:02:58Z
dc.date.available2020-10-16T08:02:58Z
dc.date.issued2020-03
dc.description.abstractBackground: Pre labor Rupture of membranes is a common obstetrical problem, significant event as it transforms an ordinary pregnancy into a high risk one. Majority of cases of PROM - of about 60% occur after 37 completed weeks Induction of labour is artificial. Misoprostol is receiving attention as a cervical modifier and labour induction agent. This study compares the safety and efficacy of Misoprostol with Oxytocin in labour induction in term pre labour rupture of membranes. Objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of Misoprostol with that of Oxytocin in labour induction in PROM. The effects were compared between primipara and multipara in a selected sample.Methods: General condition is assessed by pulse rate, blood pressure, height, weight with particular attention to pedal odema, anemia. Cardiovascular and respiratory systems were examined, rule out cephalo pelvic disproportion and for Bishop’s scoring. USG for foetal maturity, Liquor status and for foetal well-being. Admission CTG.Results: There is no significant difference was observed between two groups either in vaginal delivery or in incidence of LSCS. Mean induction delivery interval in misoprostol group for nullipara is 8.5 hours. For multipara it is 6.6 hours. And in oxytocin group for nullipara is 10:4 hours. In multipara it is 6.5 for primipara it was significantly reduced in misoprostol group compared to syntocinon group.Conclusions: Misoprostol is an effective, cheap, safe, stable at room temperature and easy to use if it is used in appropriate dosage for induction of labour in pre-labour rupture of membranes at term.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, GMERS Medical College and Hospital, Sola, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, Indiaen_US
dc.identifier.citationBhatu Jaydeep J., Chaudhari Ankita B., Chauhan Nilesh R.. Oxytocin versus Misoprostol used as an induction of labour in term in early rupture of Amniotic membranes. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020 Mar; 9(3): 1023-1028en_US
dc.identifier.issn2320-1770
dc.identifier.issn2320-1789
dc.identifier.placeIndiaen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/207492
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherMedip Academyen_US
dc.relation.issuenumber3en_US
dc.relation.volume9en_US
dc.source.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20200868en_US
dc.subjectEarly rupture of membranesen_US
dc.subjectInduction of labouren_US
dc.subjectMeconium stained liquoren_US
dc.subjectMisoprostolen_US
dc.subjectNeonatal intensive care uniten_US
dc.subjectOxytocinen_US
dc.titleOxytocin versus Misoprostol used as an induction of labour in term in early rupture of Amniotic membranesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ijrcog2020v9n3p1023.pdf
Size:
183.75 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Collections
International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology