Haemostatic effects of crystalloid vs colloid prime in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorSingh, R Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorNinan, Ben_US
dc.contributor.authorMohan, C Ren_US
dc.date.accessioned1999-07-12en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-05-27T04:04:29Z
dc.date.available1999-07-12en_US
dc.date.available2009-05-27T04:04:29Z
dc.date.issued1999-07-12en_US
dc.description.abstractThe controversy surrounding the use of a colloid or a crystalloid prime in the cardiopulmonary circuit still continues and is a matter of conjecture and an unresolved issue. To evaluate the effect of 4% modified fluid gelatin on haemostasis by measurement of haemostatic variables after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery, we studied 40 patients. They were randomly assigned to 2 groups of ringer lactate and 4% modified fluid gelatin priming solution. The study conclusively proved that 4% modified fluid gelatin has no significant effect on haemostasis and could be recommended as a priming fluid in cardiopulmonary bypass circuit.en_US
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Cardiac Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Chennai, India.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSingh RK, Ninan B, Mohan CR. Haemostatic effects of crystalloid vs colloid prime in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia. 1999 Jul; 2(2): 22-6en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/1414
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.annals.inen_US
dc.titleHaemostatic effects of crystalloid vs colloid prime in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Files
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.79 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download
Collections
Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia