Comparative Study between Actofit Pro/Max and Inbody 270 BIA Machine for Measuring Body Composition Parameters

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorDabholkar, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorSarogi, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorPakhale, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorShaikh, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorPatil, Ten_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-30T05:43:41Z
dc.date.available2024-11-30T05:43:41Z
dc.date.issued2023-06
dc.description.abstractBackground: The measurement of body parameters such as body weight, body fat %, and body water % is crucial in assessingthe health and fitness status of individuals. The Actofit Pro Max/Max and Inbody 270 bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)machine are commonly used for this purpose, but their comparative accuracy has not been extensively studied.Methods: A comparative study was conducted over 319 subjects comprising athletes, standard body type, and obesesubjects. The aim of the study was to determine the correlation between the body parameters measured over 30 days ofinterval with Actofit Pro Max/Max and Inbody 270 BIA machine. Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was used to calculate thedata correlation.Results: The results of the study showed that the change in the body weight, body fat %, and body water % measured over30 days of interval with Actofit Pro Max/Max is highly correlated with that of the Inbody 270 BIA machine (r = 0.95, P < 0.001).Conclusion: The Actofit Pro Max/Max and Inbody 270 BIA machine showed a high correlation in measuring body parameterssuch as body weight, body fat %, and body water %. These findings suggest that both devices can be used interchangeablyfor body parameter measurementen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsProfessor and Head, Department of Sports Physiotherapy, D. Y. Patil University, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, Indiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsChief Technical Officer,Actofit, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India; Fellow, Department of Obesity Medicine and Diabetes, NHS, United Kingdom; Department of Endocrineand Diabetes, RCP, United Kingdom, Assistant Professor, D.Y Patil University, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India; Chief Scientific Officer,Actofit, Mumbai, Maharashtra, Indiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsChief Pductro Officer, Actofit, Mumbai, Maharashtra, Indiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsChief Executive Officer, Actofit, Mumbai,Maharashtra, Indiaen_US
dc.identifier.citationDabholkar A, Sarogi P, Pakhale K, Shaikh A, Patil T. Comparative Study between Actofit Pro/Max and Inbody 270 BIA Machine for Measuring Body Composition Parameters. International Journal of Scientific Study. 2023 Jun; 11(3): 42-45en_US
dc.identifier.issn2321-6379
dc.identifier.issn2321-595X
dc.identifier.placeIndiaen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/235330
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherInternational Research Organization for Life & Health Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.issuenumber3en_US
dc.relation.volume11en_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.ijss-sn.com/uploads/2/0/1/5/20153321/08_ijss_jun_23_oa05_-_2023.pdfen_US
dc.subjectAccuracyen_US
dc.subjectActofit Pro Max/Maxen_US
dc.subjectAthletesen_US
dc.subjectBody fat %en_US
dc.subjectBody parametersen_US
dc.subjectBody water %en_US
dc.subjectBody weighten_US
dc.subjectComparative studyen_US
dc.subjectCorrelationen_US
dc.subjectFitness statusen_US
dc.subjectHealthen_US
dc.subjectInbody 270 BIA machineen_US
dc.subjectIntervalen_US
dc.subjectMeasurementen_US
dc.subjectObese subjectsen_US
dc.subjectPearson correlation coefficienten_US
dc.subjectStandard body typeen_US
dc.titleComparative Study between Actofit Pro/Max and Inbody 270 BIA Machine for Measuring Body Composition Parametersen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
ijss2023v11n3p42.pdf
Size:
705.36 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Collections
International Journal of Scientific Study