Prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing use of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography to standard care during radical cystectomy

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorDhawan, Richaen_US
dc.contributor.authorShahul, Sajiden_US
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Joseph Devinen_US
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Norm Den_US
dc.contributor.authorSteinberg, Gary Den_US
dc.contributor.authorChaney, Mark Aen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-02T09:43:23Z
dc.date.available2019-12-02T09:43:23Z
dc.date.issued2018-07
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Our prospective, randomized clinical study aims to evaluate the utility of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Materials and Methods: Eighty patients were randomized to a standard of care group or the intervention group that received continuous intraoperative TEE. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations, median (25th percentile, 75th percentile), or numbers and percentages. Characteristics were compared between groups using independent sample t-tests, Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney tests or Chi-square tests, as appropriate. All tests were two-sided and P < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Results: Both groups had similar preoperative demographic characteristics. There was a significant difference between central line insertion with all insertions in the control group (15%, 6 vs. 0%, 0; P < 0.003). Of all the perioperative complications, 80% occurred in the control group versus 20% in the TEE group, with 21% of controls experiencing a cardiac or pulmonary complication compared to 5% in the TEE group (8 vs. 2, P < 0.04). The control group patients were more likely to have adverse cardiac complications than the TEE group (15%, 6 vs. 3%, 1; P < 0.040). Postoperative cardiac arrhythmia was observed only in the control group (13%, 5 vs. 0%, 0; P <.007). Prolonged intubation was only observed in the control group (10%, 4 vs. 0%, 0; P < 0.017). Conclusion: TEE can be a useful monitoring tool in patients undergoing radical cystectomy, limiting the use of central line insertion and potentially translating into earlier extubation and decreased postoperative cardiac morbidities.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USAen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsDepartment of Surgery/Section of Urology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USAen_US
dc.identifier.citationDhawan Richa, Shahul Sajid, Roberts Joseph Devin, Smith Norm D, Steinberg Gary D, Chaney Mark A. Prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing use of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography to standard care during radical cystectomy. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia. 2018 Jul; 21(3): 255-261en_US
dc.identifier.issn0971-9784
dc.identifier.placeIndiaen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/185755
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer - Medknowen_US
dc.relation.issuenumber3en_US
dc.relation.volume21en_US
dc.source.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_183_17en_US
dc.subjectEchocardiographyen_US
dc.subjectfluid therapyen_US
dc.subjectradical cystectomyen_US
dc.subjecttransesophagealen_US
dc.titleProspective, randomized clinical trial comparing use of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography to standard care during radical cystectomyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
aca2018v21n3p255.pdf
Size:
485.55 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Collections
Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia