An epidemiological study of animal bites in India: results of a WHO sponsored national multi-centric rabies survey.
dc.contributor.author | Sudarshan, M K | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mahendra, B J | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Madhusudana, S N | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ashwoath Narayana, D H | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Rahman, Abdul | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Rao, N S N | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | X-Meslin, F | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lobo, Derek | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ravikumar, K | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Gangaboraiah, | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-03-21 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-06-01T17:40:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-03-21 | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2009-06-01T17:40:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006-03-21 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This was a WHO sponsored national multi-centric rabies survey and one of its objectives was to find out the incidence of animal bites, anti-rabies treatment practices, Pet dog population and their care. Twenty-one medical colleges chosen with geoscatter representation conducted the survey during February-August, 2003. The survey was conducted in 18 states, covering a population of 52,731 chosen randomly from 8500 households. The annual incidence of animal bites was high, 1.7% and it was more in rural areas (1.8%), children (2.6%) and poor/low income group (75%). The main biting animal was dog (91.5%), mostly stray (63%), followed by cat (4.7%). A high proportion of bite victims did not wash their wounds with soap and water (39.5%), preferred Government hospitals (59.9%) and nerve tissue vaccine (46.9%). The use of rabies immunoglobulin was low (2.1%). A single animal bite episode led to a loss of 2.2 man-days and the cost of medicines including anti-rabies vaccine was Rs.252 (US$6). The recourse to indigenous treatment (45.3%) and local application to wound (36.8%/) was quite prevalent. About 17% of households reported having a pet/domesticated dog and the pet dog: man ratio was 1: 36. Pet dog care/management practices were not satisfactory with a low veterinary consultation (35.5%) and vaccination (32.9%). The situation was slightly better in urban areas. The people also reported the presence (83%) and menace (22.8%) of stray dogs. It is recommended to initiate appropriate community awareness and dog vaccination campaigns and effective stray dog control measures. | en_US |
dc.description.affiliation | Association for Prevention and Control of Rabies in India (APCRI). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Sudarshan MK, Mahendra BJ, Madhusudana SN, Ashwoath Narayana DH, Rahman A, Rao NS, X-Meslin F, Lobo D, Ravikumar K, Gangaboraiah . An epidemiological study of animal bites in India: results of a WHO sponsored national multi-centric rabies survey. Journal of Communicable Diseases. 2006 Mar; 38(1): 32-9 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/111673 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Animals | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Animals, Domestic | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Bites and Stings --epidemiology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Child | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Disease Reservoirs --statistics & numerical data | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dog Diseases --epidemiology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dogs | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Health Surveys | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Incidence | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | India --epidemiology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Rabies --epidemiology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Rabies Vaccines --administration & dosage | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Vaccination | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | World Health Organization | en_US |
dc.title | An epidemiological study of animal bites in India: results of a WHO sponsored national multi-centric rabies survey. | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_US |
dc.type | Multicenter Study | en_US |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1