Interpretation: a confounding factor.

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorGupta, Mohit
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-21T09:20:45Z
dc.date.available2016-12-21T09:20:45Z
dc.date.issued2016-04
dc.description.abstractWith reference to the article “Passive euthanasia in India: a critique”, authored by Ms Rohini Shukla and published online on August 5, 2015, I would like to make a few comments and highlight the following points. First, the author notes that Section 309 IPC has been decriminalised. This is not so since there has neither been any amendment to the IPC, nor has any ordinance been passed regarding the matter.en_US
dc.identifier.citationGupta Mohit . Interpretation: a confounding factor. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics. 2016 Apr-jun; 1 (2): 130.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0975-5691
dc.identifier.urihttps://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/180239
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.source.urihttps://ijme.in/articles/interpretation-a-confounding-factor/?galley=htmlen_US
dc.titleInterpretation: a confounding factor.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ijme2016v1n2p130.pdf
Size:
47.08 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Indian Journal of Medical Ethics