Papillomacular bundle sparing versus conventional internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular hole ?400 µm

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Amanen_US
dc.contributor.authorMoharana, Bruttenduen_US
dc.contributor.authorKatoch, Deekshaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Ramandeepen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-25T06:36:25Z
dc.date.available2023-08-25T06:36:25Z
dc.date.issued2023-03
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare the outcomes of papillomacular bundle (PMB) sparing internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling (group LP) and conventional ILM peeling (group CP) for treatment of idiopathic macular hole (MH) of ?400 ?m. Methods: Fifteen eyes were included in each group. In group CP, conventional 360° peeling was done, while in group LP, ILM was spared over PMB. The changes in peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness and ganglion cell?inner plexiform layer (GC?IPL) thickness were analyzed at 3 months. Results: MH was closed in all with comparable visual improvement. Postoperatively, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) was significantly thinner in the temporal quadrant in group CP. GC?IPL was significantly thinner in the temporal quadrants in group LP, whereas it was comparable in group CP. Conclusion: PMB sparing ILM peeling is comparable to conventional ILM peeling in terms of closure rate and visual gain, with the advantage of less retinal damage at 3 months.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsAdvanced Eye Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Indiaen_US
dc.identifier.citationKumar Aman, Moharana Bruttendu, Katoch Deeksha, Singh Ramandeep. Papillomacular bundle sparing versus conventional internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular hole ?400 µm. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2023 Mar; 71(3): 927-932en_US
dc.identifier.issn1998-3689
dc.identifier.issn0301-4738
dc.identifier.placeIndiaen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/224899
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherAll India Ophthalmological Societyen_US
dc.relation.issuenumber3en_US
dc.relation.volume71en_US
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1666_22en_US
dc.subjectGanglion cell?inner plexiform layeren_US
dc.subjectILM peelingen_US
dc.subjectinternal limiting membraneen_US
dc.subjectmacular holeen_US
dc.subjectpapillomacular bundle sparing ILM peelingen_US
dc.subjectretinal nerve fiber layeren_US
dc.subjectsurgeryen_US
dc.titlePapillomacular bundle sparing versus conventional internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular hole ?400 µmen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
IJO2023v71n3p927.pdf
Size:
3.15 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Collections
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology