Comparative study of the efficacy of the Songkla uterine manipulator and the Hulka controlling tenaculum in laparoscopic tubal ligation.

dc.contributor.authorChoksuchat, Chainarongen_US
dc.contributor.authorTintara, Haternen_US
dc.contributor.authorSriplung, Hutchaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-05-27T21:42:10Z
dc.date.available2009-05-27T21:42:10Z
dc.date.issued2002-06-27en_US
dc.descriptionChotmaihet Thangphaet.en_US
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of the Songkla uterine manipulator (SUM) and the Hulka controlling tenaculum for manipulation of the uterus for laparoscopy. METHOD: Forty women scheduled for laparoscopic tubal ligation were randomized to the SUM group (n=20) or the Hulka group (n=20) as uterine manipulator. Laparoscopic evidence of antevertion and lateral uterine movements and organ exposure was video recorded. Assessment of organ exposure and degree of lateral uterine deviation were subsequently evaluated. RESULTS: The characteristics of the women were similar in both groups. Right, left and range of lateral uterine motion were greater in the SUM group than the Hulka group (59 vs 42 degrees, 60 vs 47 degrees, and 118 vs 89 degrees, respectively, p<0.0001). The SUM group had 2.4 times better cul-de-sac exposure than the Hulka controlling tenaculum (95% CI: 0.51-11.51, p= 0.475). The SUM exposed fallopian tubes better than the Hulka tenaculum (p=0.022) but other structures were not significantly better visualized. There were no complications in the SUM group but two had cervical bleeding in the Hulka group. CONCLUSION: The SUM has advantages over the Hulka controlling tenaculum in giving a wider angle of lateral uterine deviation and better exposure of the fallopian tubes.en_US
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkla, Thailand.en_US
dc.identifier.citationChoksuchat C, Tintara H, Sriplung H. Comparative study of the efficacy of the Songkla uterine manipulator and the Hulka controlling tenaculum in laparoscopic tubal ligation. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. 2002 Jun; 85(6): 693-7en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/45253
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.mat.or.th/journal/all.phpen_US
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshFallopian Tubes --surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshLaparoscopyen_US
dc.subject.meshSterilization, Tubal --instrumentationen_US
dc.subject.meshUterus --surgeryen_US
dc.titleComparative study of the efficacy of the Songkla uterine manipulator and the Hulka controlling tenaculum in laparoscopic tubal ligation.en_US
dc.typeClinical Trialen_US
dc.typeComparative Studyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.typeRandomized Controlled Trialen_US
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'ten_US
Files
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.79 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: