Comparative study of anatomical and functional recovery of eye along with patient satisfaction score after small-incision cataract surgery and phacoemulsification cataract surgery

dc.contributor.authorDole, Kuldeepen_US
dc.contributor.authorBaheti, Nehaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDeshpande, Rahulen_US
dc.contributor.authorKulkarni, Suchetaen_US
dc.contributor.authorShetty, Rakeshen_US
dc.contributor.authorDeshpande, Madanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-25T06:35:09Z
dc.date.available2023-08-25T06:35:09Z
dc.date.issued2022-11
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Functional recovery after cataract surgery depends on the anatomical recovery of the eye. This study compared the improvement in visual function parameters after uniocular manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) and phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Methods: This study included 310 patients divided randomly into two groups: 155 who received MSICS (MSICS group) and 155 who underwent phacoemulsification (phaco group) for cataract treatment. Outcome measures assessed included vertical and horizontal keratometry reading. The mean corneal astigmatism tear function measured using Schirmer 1 test results were recorded preoperatively, and on postoperative day 1, day 7, and day 30. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was done to record the average central macular thickness (?m) on day 7 and day 30. Results: The mean corneal astigmatism and anterior chamber inflammation were more in the MSICS group than in the phaco group immediately postoperatively. However, no statistically significant difference was found between the groups with respect to corneal sensation, mean corneal astigmatism, tear film function, and visual outcomes on postoperative day 30. Uncorrected visual acuity was better in the phacoemulsification group than in the manual SICS group on postoperative day 1, day 7, and day 30 (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Both phacoemulsification cataract surgery and manual small-incision sutureless cataract surgery (MSICS) are safe and effective for visual rehabilitation. Phacoemulsification is the preferred technique where resources are available with the advantages of less mean corneal astigmatism, less anterior chamber inflammation, and better uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) in the immediate postoperative perioden_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsDepartment of Community Ophthalmology, Pune, Maharashtra, Indiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsDepartment of General Ophthalomology, Pune, Maharashtra, Indiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsDepartment of Occculoplasty and Ocular Oncology, Pune, Maharashtra, Indiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsRetina, PBMA抯 HV Desai Eye Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, Indiaen_US
dc.identifier.citationDole Kuldeep, Baheti Neha, Deshpande Rahul, Kulkarni Sucheta, Shetty Rakesh, Deshpande Madan. Comparative study of anatomical and functional recovery of eye along with patient satisfaction score after small-incision cataract surgery and phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2022 Nov; 70(11): 3942-3947en_US
dc.identifier.issn1998-3689
dc.identifier.issn0301-4738
dc.identifier.placeIndiaen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/224679
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherAll India Ophthalmological Societyen_US
dc.relation.issuenumber11en_US
dc.relation.volume70en_US
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1614_22en_US
dc.subjectCorneal astigmatismen_US
dc.subjectmanual small-incision cataract surgeryen_US
dc.subjectphacoemulsification cataract surgeryen_US
dc.subjectuncorrected visual acuityen_US
dc.titleComparative study of anatomical and functional recovery of eye along with patient satisfaction score after small-incision cataract surgery and phacoemulsification cataract surgeryen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
IJO2022v70n11p3942.pdf
Size:
1.61 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format