Visual field assessment in glaucoma: comparative evaluation of manual kinetic Goldmann perimetry and automated static perimetry.

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorAgarwal, H Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorGulati, Ven_US
dc.contributor.authorSihota, Ren_US
dc.date.accessioned2000-12-09en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-05-29T09:12:57Z
dc.date.available2000-12-09en_US
dc.date.available2009-05-29T09:12:57Z
dc.date.issued2000-12-09en_US
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To compare the detection and assessment of progression of visual field defects in primary open-angle glaucoma with manual suprathreshold perimetry on Goldmann perimeter and automated static threshold perimetry on Humphery visual field (HVF) analyzer. METHODS: 105 eyes of 54 patients of primary open-angle glaucoma were followed up with 3-monthly perimetry on Goldmann perimeter and HVF analyzer, for a period of 9 months. RESULTS: HVF analyzer picked up visual field defects in 48 (46%) eyes whereas Goldmann perimeter picked up visual field defects in 26 (25%) eyes. HVF analyzer demonstrated progression in 14 eyes whereas Goldmann perimeter detected progression in 7 eyes during follow up of 9 months. CONCLUSIONS: HVF analyzer is superior to Goldmann perimeter to document and to demonstrate progression of visual field defects in primary open-angle glaucoma.en_US
dc.description.affiliationDr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi-110 029, India.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAgarwal HC, Gulati V, Sihota R. Visual field assessment in glaucoma: comparative evaluation of manual kinetic Goldmann perimetry and automated static perimetry. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2000 Dec; 48(4): 301-6en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/71347
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.ijo.inen_US
dc.subject.meshAdolescenten_US
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshAgeden_US
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 and overen_US
dc.subject.meshAutomatic Data Processingen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshGlaucoma, Open-Angle --diagnosisen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subject.meshPerimetry --methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshReproducibility of Resultsen_US
dc.subject.meshSeverity of Illness Indexen_US
dc.subject.meshVisual Fields --physiologyen_US
dc.titleVisual field assessment in glaucoma: comparative evaluation of manual kinetic Goldmann perimetry and automated static perimetry.en_US
dc.typeClinical Trialen_US
dc.typeComparative Studyen_US
dc.typeEvaluation Studiesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.typeRandomized Controlled Trialen_US
Files
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.79 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download
Collections
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology