Acyclovir is not effective in pityriasis rosea: Results of a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
dc.contributor.author | Singh, Sanjay | |
dc.contributor.author | Anurag | |
dc.contributor.author | Tiwary, Narendra K | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-11-15T11:21:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-11-15T11:21:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-09 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Acyclovir is considered to be an effective treatment for pityriasis rosea but randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trials have not been performed. Aims: To test the efficacy of acyclovir in pityriasis rosea in a randomized, triple–blind, placebo-controlled trial. Methods: Twenty seven patients with pityriasis rosea were randomly allocated to receive placebo (n = 13) or acyclovir (800 mg fi ve times daily for one week) (n = 14). The severity of disease was assessed by the pityriasis rosea area and severity index. Cure was defi ned as the absence of erythema, with no or minimal scaling. Results: The number of days (mean ± standard deviation) taken for cure was not signifi cantly different between the two groups (placebo 26.54 ± 9.14 days versus acyclovir 33.29 ± 9.49 days; P = 0.0720, t-test; 95% confi dence interval of difference −0.65 to 14.14 days). Limitations: The sample size for the present study was calculated using data from an earlier study. As the standard deviation was not mentioned in that article, a common standard deviation of fi fteen days was assumed. A study with a larger sample size may be more effective in detecting minor treatment differences between acyclovir and placebo, if they exist at all. Conclusion: Acyclovir is not an effective treatment for pityriasis rosea. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Singh Sanjay, Anurag, Tiwary Narendra K. Acyclovir is not effective in pityriasis rosea: Results of a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology. 2016 Sept-Oct; 82(5): 505-509. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/178461 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.source.uri | https://www.ijdvl.com/article.asp?issn=0378-6323;year=2016;volume=82;issue=5;spage=505;epage=509;aulast=Singh | en_US |
dc.subject | Acyclovir | en_US |
dc.subject | pityriasis rosea | en_US |
dc.subject | randomized controlled trial | en_US |
dc.title | Acyclovir is not effective in pityriasis rosea: Results of a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial. | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- ijdvl2016v82n5p505.pdf
- Size:
- 347.41 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Original article
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.71 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: