Comparison conventional endoscopic myringoplasty with fibrin glue supplemented endoscopic myringoplasty

dc.contributor.authorDevendiran, Rajendiranen_US
dc.contributor.authorMohanbabu, Nagabooshanamen_US
dc.contributor.authorRavikumar, Venugopalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-17T08:54:56Z
dc.date.available2023-06-17T08:54:56Z
dc.date.issued2022-07
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The fibrin tissue glues have been used in many surgeries to reinforce surgical sutures and tissue adhesion. Myringoplasty is the commonly done ear surgery for the perforations of the tympanic membrane, where no suturing is done between remnant membrane and graft. Aim: The aim of the study is to compare the results and effectiveness of this biological fibrin tissue glue in myringoplasty surgeries as a supplementary procedure to conventional endoscopic myringoplasty (CEM) surgeries. Materials and Methods: Seventy patients with chronic suppurative otitis media with tympanic membrane perforation without ossicular and mastoid involvement have been chosen. One group of 35 patients underwent CEM surgeries. In another group of 35 patients, biological fibrin tissue glue, TISSEEL, has been used as supplementary to the CEM surgeries, and the graft uptake rate and hearing improvement were evaluated and compared postoperatively. Results: The graft success rate at 3 months postoperatively was 91.42% in both the groups, that is, 32/35, and these values were not statistically significantly different (P = 1.00). There was a highly statistically significant hearing outcome before and after the surgery in both the CEM and the fibrin tissue glue supplemented endoscopic myringoplasty groups. However, there was no statistically significant change in hearing outcomes between the two groups. Conclusion: In our study, we have got more or less similar results compared with the results of the studies on routine CEM cases. But the high-cost nature of the commercially available fibrin tissue glue makes it difficult to recommend for use in all routine endoscopy myringoplasty casesen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsDepartment of ENT, Government Villupuram Medical College, Villupuramen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsDepartment of ENT, Government Thiruvarur Medical College, Thiruvaruren_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsDepartment of ENT, Government Medical College, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, Indiaen_US
dc.identifier.citationDevendiran Rajendiran, Mohanbabu Nagabooshanam, Ravikumar Venugopal. Comparison conventional endoscopic myringoplasty with fibrin glue supplemented endoscopic myringoplasty. MGM Journal of Medical Sciences. 2022 Jul; 9(3): 383-387en_US
dc.identifier.issn2347-7946
dc.identifier.issn2347-7962
dc.identifier.placeIndiaen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/217048
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer – Medknowen_US
dc.relation.issuenumber3en_US
dc.relation.volume9en_US
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/mgmj.mgmj_131_22en_US
dc.subjectFibrin glueen_US
dc.subjectfibrin tissue adhesiveen_US
dc.subjecttissue glueen_US
dc.titleComparison conventional endoscopic myringoplasty with fibrin glue supplemented endoscopic myringoplastyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
MGMJ2022v9n3p383.pdf
Size:
921.5 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format