Why go endocapsular?

dc.contributor.authorMehta, M Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorDada, V Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorSingh, A Ken_US
dc.date.accessioned1991-04-01en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-05-29T10:22:38Z
dc.date.available1991-04-01en_US
dc.date.available2009-05-29T10:22:38Z
dc.date.issued1991-04-01en_US
dc.description.abstractA prospective randomized clinical trial was carried out to compare the intercapsular or the endocapsular technique of IOL insertion and conventional posterior chamber IOL insertion after can opener capsulotomy. Age and sex matched groups of 76 patients each underwent surgery by the two techniques. The corneal and the uveal reaction was evaluated on the first day after the surgery and specular counts were done at six weeks. Though the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant, a trend in favour of intercapsular technique emerged strongly.en_US
dc.description.affiliationDr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.en_US
dc.identifier.citationMehta MR, Dada VK, Singh AK. Why go endocapsular? Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 1991 Apr-Jun; 39(2): 53-4en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/72617
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.ijo.inen_US
dc.subject.meshCataract Extraction --methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshCell Counten_US
dc.subject.meshEndothelium, Corneal --pathologyen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshIridocyclitis --pathologyen_US
dc.subject.meshLens Capsule, Crystalline --surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshLenses, Intraocularen_US
dc.subject.meshMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subject.meshPrognosisen_US
dc.subject.meshProspective Studiesen_US
dc.titleWhy go endocapsular?en_US
dc.typeClinical Trialen_US
dc.typeComparative Studyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.typeRandomized Controlled Trialen_US
Files
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.79 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: