Comparative study of atienuation of needle prick pain of spinal anaesthesia by local infiltration analgesia versus EMLA skin patch

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorShaikh, Mohd Mudassiren_US
dc.contributor.authorAtiar, Juberahamad Rajjaken_US
dc.contributor.authorKhatib, Saminaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDeshmukh, Shreyas Nilkanthen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-14T07:52:27Z
dc.date.available2023-07-14T07:52:27Z
dc.date.issued2023-04
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Needle prick pain is a distressing event for a pa?ent receiving spinal anaesthesia. A ‘Needle piercing the spine’ might be physically and mentally trauma?zing for many pa?ents. This may lead to unwanted panic and anxiety during the procedure of spinal anaesthesia. To avoid this distressing needle prick pain, many clinicians have resorted to the prac?ce of giving injec?ons of local anaesthe?c or local applica?on of EMLA cream or patch at the site of spinal puncture beforehand for anaesthe?zing the skin and subcutaneous ?ssues. Methods: A prospec?ve cohort study was done. Those enrolled pa?ents were assessed by an expert anesthesiologist, who was not part of the research team, and he prescribed pa?ents either EMLA cream or regular standard lignocaine infiltra?on anaesthesia and labelled them as Group E and Group L respec?vely. The pain score was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale. Result: A total of 64 pa?ents were enrolled in the study33 in Group E and 31 in Group L. Both groups had an almost similar number of pa?ents who had a similar extent of surgery. Univariate analysis showed that the mean pain score (VAS) was significantly higher in Group E pa?ents compared to that in Group L, p<0.001. The mul?variate analysis had similar findings a?er controlling confounding factors in mul?ple regression analysis. Conclusion: Local 2% lignocaine injec?on achieved significantly more pain reduc?on during spinal needle inser?on compared to the applica?on of an EMLA patch before spinal anaesthesia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsAssociate Professor, Department Of Anaesthesia, JIIU’S Indian Ins?tute Of Medical Science and Research, Warudi, Jalna, Maharashtraen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsAssistant Professor, Department Of Anaesthesia, JIIU’S Indian Ins?tute Of Medical Science and Research, Warudi, Jalna, Maharashtraen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsProfessor, Department Of Anaesthesia, Government Cancer Hospital, Aurangabad, Maharashtraen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsResident, Department Of Anaesthesia, JIIU’S Indian Ins?tute Of Medical Science and Research, Warudi, Jalna, Maharashtraen_US
dc.identifier.citationShaikh Mohd Mudassir, Atiar Juberahamad Rajjak, Khatib Samina, Deshmukh Shreyas Nilkanth. Comparative study of atienuation of needle prick pain of spinal anaesthesia by local infiltration analgesia versus EMLA skin patch. Prathima Institute of Medical Sciences. 2023 Apr; 11(1): 25-29en_US
dc.identifier.issn2348-229X
dc.identifier.issn2348-1447
dc.identifier.placeIndiaen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/219009
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherPrathima Institute of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.issuenumber1en_US
dc.relation.volume11en_US
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.47799/pimr.1101.04en_US
dc.subjectEMLAen_US
dc.subjectLignocaineen_US
dc.subjectVASen_US
dc.subjectVisual Analogue Scaleen_US
dc.subjectNeedle inser?onen_US
dc.subjectSpinal Anaesthesiaen_US
dc.titleComparative study of atienuation of needle prick pain of spinal anaesthesia by local infiltration analgesia versus EMLA skin patchen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PIMR2023v11n1p25.pdf
Size:
93.64 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Collections
Perspectives in Medical Research