Comparison of Radiation Exposure in Patients Undergoing Single Vessel PCI (Requiring Single Stent) with and without Clear Stent and Clear Stent Live Technology

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBilal, Syeden_US
dc.contributor.authorLone, Ajazen_US
dc.contributor.authorRashid, Aamiren_US
dc.contributor.authorSultan, Alai Mohammaden_US
dc.contributor.authorRather, Hilalen_US
dc.contributor.authorHafiz, Imranen_US
dc.contributor.authorDar, Iqbalen_US
dc.contributor.authorTramboo, Nisaren_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-02T06:08:27Z
dc.date.available2020-01-02T06:08:27Z
dc.date.issued2019-07
dc.description.abstractInvasive cardiology procedures provide great diagnostic and therapeutic benefit to patients but also subject them to considerable radiation exposure. CLEAR stent Live is the unique real time stent enhancement and gives a clear display of the undeployed stent. Aims & Objectives: To compare the radiation exposure in patients requiring single stent having single vessel coronary artery disease With & Without CLEAR stent and CLEAR stent Live Technology. Methods: It was a non-randomized study and included 246 patients. Group A included 123 patients who underwent Single vessel stenting using Clear stent technology as compared to group B who underwent stenting with conventional flouroscopic imaging. Radiation exposure between the two groups was compared. Results: The mean age of patients in Group A was 57.3±11.87 years while as in Group B it was 58.6±10.72 years (p=0.368). Majority of patients were males [(89(72.4%) vs 94(76.4%) (p=0.46) Group A vs B respectively] in both groups. The fluoro time in Group A was 10.6 minutes vs Group B = 11.2 minutes(p=0.15) The difference in procedure time between two groups(37.8 vs 35.9 min ,Group A vs Group B p=0.2) was statistically insignificant.The number of cine shots was significantly less in Group A as compared with Group B( 26.9 vs 30.1( Group A vs Group B) (p<0.002 ). The mean radiation exposure (mGy) in GroupA was significantly less as compared to Group B(581.7 ±293.6 vs 658.4 ±287.1 p= 0.039). The benefit of less radiation of Clear Stent technology was consistent across all vessels. Conclusion: The present study suggests that in selected patients, compared with conventional X-ray fluoroscopy imaging, the use of live clear stent technology can be performed with less radiation dose to patient.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsSenior Technologist (Msc Cardiology).en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsAdditional Professor Cardiology SKIMS soura.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsMD DM, Department of Cardiology SKIMS Soura.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsProfessor, Department of Cardiology SKIMS Soura.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsSenior Resident, Department of Cardiology SKIMS Soura.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsProfessor & HOD, Department of Cardiology SKIMS soura.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBilal Syed, Lone Ajaz, Rashid Aamir, Sultan Alai Mohammad, Rather Hilal, Hafiz Imran, Dar Iqbal, Tramboo Nisar. Comparison of Radiation Exposure in Patients Undergoing Single Vessel PCI (Requiring Single Stent) with and without Clear Stent and Clear Stent Live Technology. Annals of International medical and Dental Research. 2019 Jul; 5(4): 14-17en_US
dc.identifier.issn2395-2822
dc.identifier.issn2395-2814
dc.identifier.placeIndiaen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/188953
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherSociety for Health Care & Research Developmenten_US
dc.relation.issuenumber4en_US
dc.relation.volume5en_US
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.21276/aimdr.2019.5.4.ME4en_US
dc.subjectRadiationen_US
dc.subjectClear Stenten_US
dc.subjectFlouroen_US
dc.titleComparison of Radiation Exposure in Patients Undergoing Single Vessel PCI (Requiring Single Stent) with and without Clear Stent and Clear Stent Live Technologyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
aimdr2019v5n4p14.pdf
Size:
1.81 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Collections
Annals of International Medical and Dental Research