World Health Organization

Permanent URI for this community

https://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/137138

Browse

Browsing World Health Organization by Subject "Adolescent"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Integrating adolescent-friendly health services into the public health system: an experience from rural India.
    (WHO Regional Office for South-East Asia, 2013-07) Mehra, Sunil; Sogarwal, Ruchi; Chandra, Murari
    Background: Although India’s health policy is directed toward improving adolescent reproductive health, adolescent-friendly health services are scarce. The intervention for “integrating adolescent-friendly health services into the public health system” is an effort to improve the health status of adolescents in rural areas of the Varanasi (Arajiline) and Bangalore (Hosakote) districts in India. The purpose of this article is to describe the features of the intervention and investigate the impact on improving awareness and utilization of services by adolescent, as well as quality of ARSH services in the intervention districts. Methods: Data from project monitoring, community survey (737 adolescents), exit interviews (120 adolescents), assessment of adolescent sexual and reproductive health clinics (n = 4), and health service statistics were used. Descriptive analyses and paired t-tests were used to compare the two intervention districts. Results: Overall, the percentage of adolescents who were aware of the services being offered at a health-care facility was higher in Hosakote (range: 56.2% to 74.7%) as compared to Arajiline (range: 67.3% to 96.9); 23.3% and 42.6% of adolescents in Arajiline and Hosakote typically sought multiple services at any one visit. A large percentage of clients (Arajiline: 81.7%; Hosakote: 95.0%) were satisfied with the services they received from the facility. The relative change in uptake of services from the first quarter (January to March 2009) to the last quarter (October to December 2010) was significantly higher in Arajiline (7.93, P = 0.020) than in Hosakote (0.78, P = 0.007). Conclusion: The intervention had positive results for the public health system and the services are being scaled up to different blocks of the districts, under a public–private partnership.