Noise & Health

Permanent URI for this collection

https://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/121911

Browse

Browsing Noise & Health by Author "Altschuler,"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Absence of hair cell protection by exogenous FGF-1 and FGF-2 delivered to guinea pig cochlea in vivo.
    (2001-04-12) Yamasoba,; Altschuler,; Raphael,; Miller,; Shoji,; Miller,
    Recent findings that glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), neurotrophin-3 (NT-3), and transforming growth factor a can protect the auditory hair cells from acoustic trauma or aminoglycoside ototoxicity in vivo raise the question of whether other neurotrophic factors can also protect the hair cells in vivo. Fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) can protect hair cells from neomycin ototoxicity in vitro, and in vivo study has shown upregulation of FGF receptor-3 in the cochlea following noise exposure, suggesting that some FGF family members might play a role in protection or repair of the cochlea from damage. We therefore examined if FGF-1 and FGF-2 chronically delivered to the cochlea prior to noise overstimulation can attenuate noise-induced hair cell damage in vivo under conditions in which GDNF and NT-3 were effective. Pigmented female guinea pigs underwent left scala tympani implantation of a microcannula attached to an osmotic pump filled with artificial perilymph only or containing FGFs (10 or 1 mg/ml FGF-1 or 10 mg/ml FGF-2). They were exposed to noise (4 kHz octave band, 115 dB SPL, 5 hr) 4 days after surgery. Threshold shifts 10 days postexposure were essentially equivalent at all frequencies tested across different treatment groups. No significant difference in threshold shifts was observed between the treated and untreated ears in any of the groups. The extent of hair cell damage was also comparable among the different treatment groups. These findings indicate that exogenous FGF-1 or FGF-2 does not influence noise-induced hair cell damage under the experimental conditions used in this study, suggesting that these FGFs are not good candidates as auditory hair cell protectors in vivo.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Differential Gene Expression Following Noise Trauma in Birds and Mammals.
    (2001-04-12) Lomax,; Gong,; Cho,; Huang,; Oh,; Adler,; Raphael,; Altschuler,
    Acoustic overstimulation has very different outcomes in birds and mammals. When noise exposure kills hair cells in birds, these cells can regenerate and hearing will recover. In mammals, however, the hair cell loss, and resulting hearing loss, is permanent. Changes in gene expression form the basis for important biological processes, including repair, regeneration, and plasticity. We are therefore using a battery of molecular approaches to identify and compare changes in gene expression following noise trauma in birds and mammals. Both differential display and subtractive hybridisation were used to identify genes whose expression increased in the chick basilar papilla immediately following exposure to an octave band noise (118 dB, centre frequency 1.5 kHz) for 4-6 hr. Among those upregulated genes were two involved in actin signalling: the CDC42 gene encoding a Rho GTPase, and WDR1, which encodes a protein involved in actin dynamics. A third gene, UBE3B, encodes an E3 ubiquitin ligase involved in protein turnover. A fourth gene encodes a cystein-rich secreted protein that may interact with calcium channels. To examine the mammalian response, gene microarrays on nylon membranes (Clontech Atlas Gene Arrays) were used to examine global changes in gene expression 30 minutes after TTS (110 dB broadband noise 50% duty cycle) or PTS (125 dB, 100% duty cycle) noise overstimulation (each for 90 minutes) in the rat cochlea. Several genes, including classic immediate early response genes such as c-fos, EGR1/NGFI-A, and NGFI-B, were upregulated at this early time point following the PTS exposure, but were not upregulated following the TTS exposure.