Chakraborty, R1999-07-222009-05-311999-07-222009-05-311999-07-22Chakraborty R. Angioplasty versus coronary artery by-pass surgery: a reappraisal. Journal of the Indian Medical Association. 1999 Jul; 97(7): 271-5http://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/10298121 references.Revascularisation is the main principle of treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease. This technique is available either by catheter intervention like angioplasty or by-pass surgery. The superiority of one over the other is still undetermined. In symptomatic single vessel disease angioplasty may be a better option than by-pass surgery. In two-vessel coronary artery disease angioplasty may also be preferred especially with good left ventricular function. In patients with double-vessel disease particularly involving proximal left anterior descending artery in association with diabetes mellitus surgery has better long term results. In multivessel disease by-pass surgery is a preferred option although initial results of angioplasty in this group may be very satisfactory. The incidence of further intervention either by surgery or repeat angioplasty is high in patients undergoing angioplasty in multivessel disease. Left main stem disease should be dealt with by-pass surgery. With continued advancement in the revascularisation technology of coronary artery disease both in catheter intervention and surgical fronts there is no room for unequivocal or universal strategy plan in the management of coronary artery disease. Both the techniques are complimentary to each other. Cost consideration is a major consideration in India. Choice should be made after proper evaluation of coronary anatomy, underlying clinical condition, local experience, social and especially economic circumstances.engAngioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous Coronary --adverse effectsCoronary Artery Bypass --adverse effectsCoronary Artery Disease --complicationsCoronary Disease --economicsHealth Care CostsHumansIndiaReoperationTreatment OutcomeJournal Article