Radhakrishna, SMurthy, B NNair, N GEzhil, RVenkatasubramanian, SRamalingam, NPeriannan, VGanesan, R1995-03-012009-05-271995-03-012009-05-271995-03-01Radhakrishna S, Murthy BN, Nair NG, Ezhil R, Venkatasubramanian S, Ramalingam N, Periannan V, Ganesan R. A concurrent comparison of a WHO-recommended 30-cluster survey and a modified version of it under Indian conditions in the estimation of immunization coverages. Indian Pediatrics. 1995 Mar; 32(3): 383-90http://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/14204A concurrent comparison of the WHO 30-cluster sample survey method for estimating immunization coverages (DPT, Polio, BCG, Measles) and an Indian modification of (GOI) was undertaken in five districts in South India. The essential difference between the two methods is the manner in which the first household is selected in the chosen clusters. With the WHO method, it is chosen clusters. With the WHO method, it is chosen at random, whereas with the GOI method it is often close to the village centre. Estimates with the required degree of precision, i.e., 95% confidence limits of +/- 10 percentage points, were provided in 18 (90%) of 20 instances by the WHO method and in 19 (95%) by the GOI method, findings which are in accordance with expectation. The estimated coverages were, however, higher by the GOI method than by the WHO method in two districts, lower in one district, and in the remaining two districts there was no clear pattern. On the average, there was a suggestion that the GOI method yielded slightly higher coverages, but the differences were not statistically significant.engHealth SurveysHumansImmunization --utilizationIndiaInfantResearch DesignSelection BiasWorld Health OrganizationClinical Trial