EFFICACY AND DISADVANTAGES OF REGENERATIVE DENTISTRY

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Kafilul Barien_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-09T06:14:12Z
dc.date.available2025-05-09T06:14:12Z
dc.date.issued2024-07
dc.description.abstractRegenerative dentistry has emerged as a promising field aiming to restore and repair damaged dental tissues through the activation of natural healing processes. This comprehensive review examines the efficacy and disadvantages associated with regenerative approaches in dentistry. By synthesizing existing literature and clinical evidence, we provide an in-depth analysis of various regenerative techniques, including pulp regeneration, periodontal regeneration, and bone regeneration. Pulp regeneration procedures, such as pulp capping and revascularization, have shown promising outcomes in preserving pulpal vitality and promoting dentin formation. Similarly, periodontal regeneration therapies, such as guided tissue regeneration (GTR) and enamel matrix derivatives (EMDs), have demonstrated efficacy in promoting periodontal tissue regeneration and mitigating periodontal defects. Additionally, bone grafting procedures combined with growth factors and biomaterial scaffolds have facilitated successful implant placement and prosthetic rehabilitation in edentulous patients. Despite these advancements, regenerative dentistry faces challenges such as patient variability, regulatory considerations, cost, and long-term stability. Patient selection and personalized treatment planning are essential to optimize outcomes and minimize the risk of treatment failure. Regulatory compliance and adherence to established guidelines are crucial to ensure patient safety and treatment efficacy. Furthermore, addressing the financial barriers and accessibility issues associated with regenerative procedures is imperative to broaden their reach and impact. Long-term studies evaluating the stability and durability of regenerative outcomes are warranted to assess the longevity of regenerated tissues and prevent adverse outcomes. Overall, regenerative dentistry holds immense promise for improving patient care and treatment outcomes, but careful consideration of its limitations is essential for informed decision-making and successful clinical implementation.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, KIIT (deemed to be) University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India-751024en_US
dc.identifier.citationKhan Kafilul Bari . EFFICACY AND DISADVANTAGES OF REGENERATIVE DENTISTRY. Era's Journal of Medical Research. 2024 Jul; 11(1): 47-50en_US
dc.identifier.issn2348-9839
dc.identifier.issn2394-5222
dc.identifier.placeIndiaen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/242630
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherEra's Lucknow Medical College & Hospital, Lucknow in association with American University of Barbados (AUB)en_US
dc.relation.issuenumber1en_US
dc.relation.volume11en_US
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.24041/ejmr2024.7en_US
dc.subjectRegenerative Dentistryen_US
dc.subjectPulp Regenerationen_US
dc.subjectDentin Formationen_US
dc.subjectBone Grafting.en_US
dc.titleEFFICACY AND DISADVANTAGES OF REGENERATIVE DENTISTRYen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
ejmr2024v11n1p47.pdf
Size:
5.19 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Collections
Era's Journal of Medical Research