Jahi McMath and the Ethics of the Brain Death Standard.

dc.contributor.authorSwazo, Norman K
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-05T05:09:34Z
dc.date.available2015-12-05T05:09:34Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractAbstract: How does one account for “the discrepancy” between the evidence of total and irreversible brain death and the current evidence of recovered brain function? This is the question that is raised by recent legal action in the case of 13-year old Jahi McMath, certified dead on the basis of neurological criteria but maintained in mechanical ventilation and medical/nursing care since then at the insistence of the parents who claim she is alive. In this brief discussion, the medical and legal issues are reviewed. Here the argument is advanced that this is not a case that means there should be a re-evaluation of the neurological criteria for determination of brain death. Instead, this case is to be understood as the exception that proves the rule.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSwazo Norman K. Jahi McMath and the Ethics of the Brain Death Standard. Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics. 2014; 5(3): 18-22.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2226-9231
dc.identifier.issn2078-1458
dc.identifier.urihttps://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/167171
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.banglajol.info/index.php/BIOETHICS/article/view/21533en_US
dc.titleJahi McMath and the Ethics of the Brain Death Standard.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
bjb2014v5n3p18.pdf
Size:
103.92 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: