Conventional ESR V/S Automated VES- MATIC 20/20 Plus New ESR- A Comparative Study Of 100 Cases

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKaur, Mohanviren_US
dc.contributor.authorMittal, Anikaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPoonamen_US
dc.contributor.authorPuri, Arunen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T09:25:57Z
dc.date.available2019-12-06T09:25:57Z
dc.date.issued2018-03
dc.description.abstractBackground: To compare the ESR values by Ves- matic 20/20 plus new with the conventional Westergren method, aiming to validate the automated methods. Methods: A cross – sectional study was conducted in Government Medical College, Patiala. A total of 100 blood samples were subjected to ESR estimation by manual Westergren method and by automated (Ves – Matic) method. Results were analysed, compared and their correlation was calculated using Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: There is a strong positive correlation between Westergren method and Ves- matic 20/20 plus new with correlation coefficient 0.99. Conclusion: Ves-matic method (automated) shows good correlationwith manual Westergren method and is reliable and suitable for use in high work load clinical laboratory.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsAssistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Patialaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsJunior Resident, Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Patialaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsSenior resident, Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Patialaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationsProfessor, Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Patialaen_US
dc.identifier.citationKaur Mohanvir, Mittal Anika, Poonam, Puri Arun. Conventional ESR V/S Automated VES- MATIC 20/20 Plus New ESR- A Comparative Study Of 100 Cases. Annals of International medical and Dental Research. 2018 Mar; 4(2): 34-36en_US
dc.identifier.issn2395-2822
dc.identifier.issn2395-2814
dc.identifier.placeIndiaen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/188552
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherSociety for Health Care & Research Developmenten_US
dc.relation.issuenumber2en_US
dc.relation.volume4en_US
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.21276/aimdr.2018.4.2.PT8en_US
dc.titleConventional ESR V/S Automated VES- MATIC 20/20 Plus New ESR- A Comparative Study Of 100 Casesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
aimdr2018v4n2p34n.pdf
Size:
310.58 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Collections
Annals of International Medical and Dental Research