Attitudes of Japanese primary care physicians toward publicly endorsed periodic health examinations: a cross sectional survey.
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2007-04-19
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the lack of evidence for efficacy, an annual health examination has been advocated for the general population by the Japanese government. We conducted a cross-sectional survey to understand the attitudes of Japanese physicians toward the annual examinations.
METHODS: In October 2003, a questionnaire was mailed to 1971 physicians registered with Aichi Prefecture Medical Association as internists. The survey was designed to determine their opinions about the effectiveness of the periodic health examination and each of its components.
RESULTS: The response rate was 37%. Eighty-five percent believed that a periodic health examination was effective. Nearly 80% believed that height and weight should be measured, and more than 90% supported blood pressure measurements. Nearly 70% supported a physical examination of chest and abdomen. About half believed that vision and hearing tests should be performed for all ages. More than 90% considered performing a variety of laboratory tests valuable. Three-quarters supported hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis C antibody determinations. Seventy to eighty percent valued the screening tests for lung, stomach, colon, breast and cervical cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Most Japanese primary care physicians believe that a comprehensive annual health examination as currently endorsed by public health authorities is effective.
Description
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.
Keywords
Citation
Miyazaki K, Sato J, Mukohara K, Kitamura K, Saito S, Ban N. Attitudes of Japanese primary care physicians toward publicly endorsed periodic health examinations: a cross sectional survey. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2007 Apr-Jun; 8(2): 258-62