Comparative susceptibility of two forms of Anopheles sinensis Wiedemann 1828 (Diptera : Culicidae) to infection with Plasmodium falciparum, P. vivax, P. yoelii and the determination of misleading factor for sporozoite identification.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
1998-03-18
Authors
Rongsriyam, Y
Jitpakdi, A
Choochote, W
Somboon, P
Tookyang, B
Suwonkerd, W
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Two karyotypic forms of laboratory-raised Anopheles sinensis, ie Form A (XY1) and Form B (XY2), were experimentally infected with various indigenous strains of Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax using an artificial membrane feeding technique, and a rodent malaria, P. yoelii, using a direct feeding technic and dissected 7-9 days and 10-15 days after feeding for oocyst and sporozoite rates, respectively. The results revealed that two forms of An. sinensis were refractory vectors for P. falciparum and P. yoelii since 0% of oocyst and sporozoite rates were obtained, but poor vectors for P. vivax since 0.00-85.71% and 0.00-5.88% of oocyst and sporozoite rates were recovered. The sporozoite-like crystal found in the median lobe of the salivary gland of An. sinensis which could be a misleading factor in identification of true sporozoites in the salivary glands is reported for the first time.
Description
The Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health.
Keywords
Citation
Rongsriyam Y, Jitpakdi A, Choochote W, Somboon P, Tookyang B, Suwonkerd W. Comparative susceptibility of two forms of Anopheles sinensis Wiedemann 1828 (Diptera : Culicidae) to infection with Plasmodium falciparum, P. vivax, P. yoelii and the determination of misleading factor for sporozoite identification. The Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. 1998 Mar; 29(1): 159-67