Antibody response in typhoid fever in endemic Indonesia and the relevance of serology and culture to diagnosis.
Loading...
Files
Date
2002-12-22
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Culture and serology were performed on blood and serum samples collected at or shortly after admission from 473 patients presented with suspected clinical typhoid. Clinical symptoms at first presentation including confusion, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, abdominal pain, anemia, and gastrointestinal bleeding were non-specific as they were observed even more often in non-typhoid patients. Culture confirmed the diagnosis in 65.3% of the patients with typhoid fever as the final diagnosis. The sensitivity (58%) and specificity (98.1%) of a rapid dipstick assay for the detection of S. typhi-specific immunoglobulin M were somewhat lower than those of culture but higher than those of the Widal test. The dipstick assay thus may well be used in the serodiagnosis of typhoid in situation where culture facilities are not available. Combination of test results of dipstick and culture improved sensitivity to 82.5%. In laboratories that perform blood culture the dipstick assay may be used as a rapid screening tests to facilitate a rapid diagnosis. Sensitivity of the dipstick assay strongly increased with duration of illness and was higher for culture positive than for culture negative patients. Duration of illness, and different pathogen and host factors including dose of infection, pathogenicity and antigenicity, and prior antibiotic use are likely to influence the immune response, therefore the result of the dipstick assay. Duration of illness and presence of S. typhi in the blood are major factors that determine severity of disease.
Description
The Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health.
Keywords
Citation
Hatta M, Mubin H, Abdoel T, Smits HL. Antibody response in typhoid fever in endemic Indonesia and the relevance of serology and culture to diagnosis. The Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. 2002 Dec; 33(4): 742-51