Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Oral Prednisolone with or without Propranolol in Treating Infantile Hemangioma Cases: A Clinical Institutional Based Study

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2019-03
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Ibn Sina Academy of Medieval Medicine & Sciences
Abstract
Background: Infantile hemangiomas (IH) are the mostcommon tumors of childhood. Systemic corticosteroids(prednisolone) have been the mainstay of treatment for IH, forseveral decades. Hence; we planned the present study toassess and compare the efficacy of oral prednisolone andpropranolol in regression of infantile hemangioma (IH).Materials & Methods: The present study included assessmentand comparison the efficacy of oral prednisolone andpropranolol in regression of IH. A total of 30 patients wereincluded in the present study. All the patients were randomlydivided into three study groups as follows: Group 1: Patientswho received oral prednisolone 5 mg/kg/day, Group 2: Patientswho received oral propranolol 3 mg/kg/day, and Group 3:Patients who received oral prednisolone 5 mg/kg/day andpropranolol 3 mg/kg/day simultaneously. We categorized casesas partial response in which there occurred a change in colorand consistency. All the results were analyzed by SPSSsoftware.Results: We observed significant results while comparing theresponse rates of the subjects of the group 1. However; wedidn’t observe any significant result, while comparing thetreatment response in subjects of group 2 and 3.Conclusion: In managing patients with IH, oral prednisolone isa viable and time tested therapeutic option. However; whenused either alone or in combination, prednisolone offers noother added benefits.
Description
Keywords
Infantile Hemangioma, Prednisolone, Propranolol
Citation
Kumar Pawan, Yadav Virendra. Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Oral Prednisolone with or without Propranolol in Treating Infantile Hemangioma Cases: A Clinical Institutional Based Study. International Journal of Medical Research Professionals. 2019 Mar; 5(2): 261-263