Post-operative Epidural Analgesia after TKR: A Double Blind Randomized Comparison of Ropivacaine 0.2% and Levobupivacaine 0.125%
Loading...
Date
2019-02
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
International Society for Contemporary Medical Research
Abstract
Introduction: With the increase in the life span of humanbeings and added to that the culture of processed food thereare increase in life style disorders in humans. The commonestorthopedic problem which we see due sedentary life style,lack of healthy wholesome diet are bone related disordersmainly osteoarthritis.Ropivacaine, an alternative to bupivacaine is structurallyclosely related to bupivacaine and supplied as the pureS-enantiomer. We therefore decided to compare the efficacy ofcontinuous infusion of levo bupivacaine against ropivacaine toidentify the differences or superiority of one drug over other.Material and methods: After obtaining the Ethics Committeeapproval, we recruited 110 patients undergoing Total KneeReplacement (TKR) surgery under Combined Spinal Epidural(CSE) Anaesthesia. Sample size of study which was calculatedas 110. All patients underwent a routine pre anaesthetic checkup including the spine examination. Pre-anaesthetic check- upwas done a day prior to surgery. All routine investigationswere advised. The details of our study were explained to thepatients, in the language understood by them. Consent wasobtained for post-operative use of Elastomeric infusion pump.They were explained about the use of VAS.Results: Both groups were comparable with respect todemographic profile. The patients in ropivacaine group showedsignificantly lower pulse rate as compared to levobupivacainegroup. Patients in ropivacaine group recorded significantlylower systolic blood pressure throughout the infusion periodas compared to those in the levobupivacaine group. Thedifference in diastolic blood pressure was not significant. Thetime taken for the sensory block to regress to L1 was longerin ropivacaine group as compared to levobupivacaine group.Conclusion: Patients in both the group had comparable VASpost operatively. Although Patients in the ropivacaine grouphad better VAS score as compared to levobupivacaine, thedifference was not statistically significant. There were noside effects like motor weakness, hypotension, bradycardia orPNOV in any group. Our present study thus concludes thatas far as analgesic properties are concerned Ropivacaine withits more suitable toxicity profile and less motor block is morefavourable for continuous infusion for patients undergoingTKR when used in equipotent doses.
Description
Keywords
Post-operative Epidural Analgesia, TKR, Ropivacaine, Levobupivacaine
Citation
Raj Amit Desh, Tikle Harshwardhan A., Fernandes Sarita, Patil Bhaskar. Post-operative Epidural Analgesia after TKR: A Double Blind Randomized Comparison of Ropivacaine 0.2% and Levobupivacaine 0.125%. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research . 2019 Feb; 6(2): b1-b8