Evaluation of Bond Strength of Silicone and Acrylic Resin Based Resilient Denture Liners Over A Period of Storage in Water
Loading...
Date
2018-01
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Society for Health Care & Research Development
Abstract
Background: Two potential problems commonly identified with a denture base incorporating a resilient liner are afailure of the bond between the acrylic resin and resilient liner material and a loss of resiliency of the resilient liner material over time. Methods: The current study was performed to assess the bond strength and hardness of acrylic resilient liner in both auto-polymerized and heat-polymerized forms and silicone resilient liner in auto-polymerized form to a processed denture base resin over a period of water storage for 1 day, 1 week and 1 month. The denture liners investigated were acrylic resin-based heat-polymerized (Super-soft), acrylic resin-based autopolymerized (Coe-Soft) and silicone based autopolymerized (GC-reline) resilient liner. The resilient liners were processed according to manufacturer’s instructions. Tensile bond strength was measured in ASI Instron universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 20 mm/min, and hardness was measured using a Shore-A durometer. Results: Two-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests were used to analyze the data (α=0.05). The results indicated that there were significant differences both in the hardness and bond strength values of resilient liner materials. Conclusion: Autopolymerized silicone resilient liner has increased bond strength and hardness values than autopolymerized acrylic liner but the bond strength and hardness values of autopolymerized silicone liner was less than heat cure acrylic resilient liner.
Description
Keywords
Resorption, Relining, Tensile strength, tissue conditioner
Citation
Sharma Aditi, Singh Randhir, Kotwal Monica. Comparative Evaluation of Radicular Push-out Bond Strength of EndoSequence BC, MTA FillApex, Apexit Plus and AH Plus Sealers as Affected by the Modified Plunger: Base Orifice Size Relation. Annals of International medical and Dental Research. 2018 Jan; 4(1): 14-18