Specific absorption rate variation in a brain phantom due to exposure by a 3G mobile phone: Problems in dosimetry.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2013-12
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
A specific absorption rate (SAR) measurements system has been developed for compliance testing of personal mobile phone in a brain phantom material contained in a Perspex box. The volume of the box has been chosen corresponding to the volume of a small rat and illuminated by a 3G mobile phone frequency (1718.5 MHz), and the emitted radiation directed toward brain phantom .The induced fields in the phantom material are measured. Set up to lift the plane carrying the mobile phone is run by a pulley whose motion is controlled by a stepper motor. The platform is made to move at a pre-determined rate of 2o per min limited up to 20o. The measured data for induced fields in various locations are used to compute corresponding SAR values and inter comparison obtained. These data are also compared with those when the mobile phone is placed horizontally with respect to the position of the animal. The SAR data is also experimentally obtained by measuring a rise in temperature due to this mobile exposures and data compared with those obtained in the previous set. To seek a comparison with the safety criteria same set of measurements are performed in 10 g phantom material contained in a cubical box. These results are higher than those obtained with the knowledge of induced field measurements. It is concluded that SAR values are sensitive to the angular position of the moving platform and are well below the safety criteria prescribed for human exposure. The data are suggestive of having a fresh look to understand the mode of electromagnetic field -bio interaction.
Description
Keywords
Mobile phone exposures, Monopole probe, Phantom material Specific absorption rate
Citation
Behari J, Nirala Jay Prakash. Specific absorption rate variation in a brain phantom due to exposure by a 3G mobile phone: Problems in dosimetry. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology. 2013 Dec; 51(12): 1079-1085.