Comparative attractiveness of CO2-baited CDC light traps and animal baits to Phlebotomus duboscqi sandflies.

Abstract
Background & objectives: In order to understand sandfly bionomics, vector species identification, and to develop methods for sandfly control, there is a need to sample sandflies in any particular habitat. This survey was aimed at determining the best method of sampling Phlebotomus (Phlebotomus) duboscqi (Diptera: Psychodidae) in the field. Methods: Different animal baits and CO2-baited CDC light traps were used to attract sandflies released in an insect-proof screen-house located in the sandfly’s natural habitat in Marigat, Baringo district of Kenya. Results: Attraction of hungry P. duboscqi female sandflies by the goat (Capra hircis) was significantly higher than that of hamster (Mesocricetus auretus), Nile grass rat (Arvicanthis niloticus), gerbil (Tatera robusta) and chicken (Gallus domestica). However, two rodent species, A. niloticus and T. robusta did not differ significantly. A linear regression analysis of weights of animal baits and number of sandflies attracted revealed an insignificant result. The fluorescent dyes used to distinguish sandflies of different day experiments seemed not to influence the sandfly numbers in relation to the studied sandfly behaviour. Interpretation & conclusion: The similar attraction pattern of P. duboscqi in semi-field environment by CO2-baited CDC light trap and the goat provides hope for solution to the problem of fast dissipating dry ice (CO2 source) in the field. Goats can, therefore, also be utilized as deflectors of vectors of cutaneous leishmaniasis from humans in zooprophylaxis in Leishmania major endemic areas where the sandfly is found.
Description
Keywords
Animal baits, CO2-baited light traps, Phlebotomus duboscqi
Citation
Kasili Sichangi, Kutima Helen, Mwandawiro Charles, Ngumbi Philip M, Anjili Christopher O. Comparative attractiveness of CO2-baited CDC light traps and animal baits to Phlebotomus duboscqi sandflies. Journal of Vector Borne Diseases. 2009 Sept; 46(3): 191-196.